[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lfwxh7mo.fsf@anholt.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 16:39:11 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Deepak Sharma <deepak.sharma@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/vgem: use normal cached mmap'ings
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> writes:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> Since there is no real device associated with VGEM, it is impossible to
> end up with appropriate dev->dma_ops, meaning that we have no way to
> invalidate the shmem pages allocated by VGEM. So, at least on platforms
> without drm_cflush_pages(), we end up with corruption when cache lines
> from previous usage of VGEM bo pages get evicted to memory.
>
> The only sane option is to use cached mappings.
This may be an improvement, but...
pin/unpin is only on attaching/closing the dma-buf, right? So, great,
you flushed the cached map once after exporting the vgem dma-buf to the
actual GPU device, but from then on you still have no interface for
getting coherent access through VGEM's mapping again, which still
exists.
I feel like this is papering over something that's really just broken,
and we should stop providing VGEM just because someone wants to write
dma-buf test code without driver-specific BO alloc ioctl code.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists