[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190717062615.10569-3-hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:26:15 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dma-direct: only limit the mapping size if swiotlb could be used
Don't just check for a swiotlb buffer, but also if buffering might
be required for this particular device.
Fixes: 133d624b1cee ("dma: Introduce dma_max_mapping_size()")
Reported-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Tested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
---
kernel/dma/direct.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index d7cec866d16b..e269b6f9b444 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -399,11 +399,9 @@ int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
size_t dma_direct_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev)
{
- size_t size = SIZE_MAX;
-
/* If SWIOTLB is active, use its maximum mapping size */
- if (is_swiotlb_active())
- size = swiotlb_max_mapping_size(dev);
-
- return size;
+ if (is_swiotlb_active() &&
+ (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE))
+ return swiotlb_max_mapping_size(dev);
+ return SIZE_MAX;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists