[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190717071027.GG28722@krava>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:10:27 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: "Lubashev, Igor" <ilubashe@...mai.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Use CAP_SYS_ADMIN with perf_event_paranoid
checks
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 05:01:26PM +0000, Lubashev, Igor wrote:
> I could add another patch to the series for that. Any suggestion for what capability to check for here?
it's:
if (geteuid() != 0) {
pr_err("ftrace only works for root!\n");
return -1
}
so I think check for CAP_SYS_ADMIN should be fine in here
jirka
>
> (There is always an alternative to not check for anything and let the kernel refuse to perform actions that the user does not have permissions to perform.)
>
> - Igor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 4:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Use CAP_SYS_ADMIN with perf_event_paranoid checks
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 08:10:04PM -0400, Igor Lubashev wrote:
> > The kernel is using CAP_SYS_ADMIN instead of euid==0 to override
> > perf_event_paranoid check. Make perf do the same.
>
> I see another geteuid check in __cmd_ftrace,
> perhaps we should cover this one as well
>
> jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists