[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5580889b-e357-e7bc-88e6-d68c4a23dd64@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 12:22:23 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>,
Eric Hankland <ehankland@...gle.com>
Cc: rkrcmar@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: PMU Event Filter
On 16/07/19 10:49, Wei Wang wrote:
> {
> KVM_PMU_EVENT_ACTION_GP_NONE = 0,
> KVM_PMU_EVENT_ACTION_GP_ACCEPT = 1,
> KVM_PMU_EVENT_ACTION_GP_REJECT = 2,
> KVM_PMU_EVENT_ACTION_MAX
> };
>
> and add comments to explain something like below:
>
> Those GP actions are for the filtering of guest events running on the
> virtual general
> purpose counters. The actions to filter guest events running on the
> virtual fixed
> function counters are not added currently as they all seem fine to be
> used by the
> guest so far, but that could be supported on demand in the future via
> adding new
> actions.
>
Let's just implement the bitmap of fixed counters (it's okay to follow
the same action as gp counters), and add it to struct
kvm_pmu_event_filter. While at it, we can add a bunch of padding u32s
and a flags field that can come in handy later (it would fail the ioctl
if nonzero).
Wei, Eric, who's going to do it? :)
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists