linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] mpt3sas: support target smid for [abort|query] task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190717121203.GE10495@minwoo-desktop>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jul 2019 21:12:03 +0900
From:   Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>
To:     Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>
Cc:     minwoo.im@...sung.com,
        "sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com" <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>,
        "sathya.prakash@...adcom.com" <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
        "suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com" 
        <suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com" <MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Euihyeok Kwon <eh81.kwon@...sung.com>,
        Sarah Cho <sohyeon.jo@...sung.com>,
        Sanggwan Lee <sanggwan.lee@...sung.com>,
        Gyeongmin Nam <gm.nam@...sung.com>,
        Sungjun Park <sj1228.park@...sung.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mpt3sas: support target smid for [abort|query] task

On 19-07-15 08:13:36, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I think this is fundamentally wrong.
> ABORT_TASK is used to abort a single task, which of course has to be
> known beforehand. If you don't know the task, what exactly do you hope
> to achieve here? Aborting random I/O?
> Or, even worse, aborting I/O the driver uses internally and corrupt the
> internal workflow of the driver?
> 
> We should simply disallow any ABORT TASK from userspace if the TaskMID
> is zero. And I would even argue to disabllow ABORT TASK from userspace
> completely, as the smid is never relayed to userland, and as such the
> user cannot know which task should be aborted.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hannes

Sreekanth,

Could you please give some thoughts about what Hannes said?