[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77f82ca2-f89b-e8e2-507a-c37bce1343a5@metux.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 16:16:39 +0200
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Robo Bot <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] debian: add generic rule file
On 16.07.19 14:34, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
Hi,
> In practice, that's not going to be a problem for most distributions.
> The traditional way Debian-derived systems have done builds is
> completely outside of git. So there will be a linux_5.2.orig.tar.gz
> and a linux_5.2-1.debian.tar.xz. dpkg_source -x will first unpackage
> the orig.tar.gz, and then the debian.tar.xz, and if the second
> overwrites the first, it's no big deal.
ACK. IIRC they already filter out debian/ directories when generating
upstream tarballs - other upstreams already provide their debian/
stuff, too.
> First, once it's checked in, I expect changes to the default
> debian/rules file will be relatively rare.
ACK. I currently don't see much reasons for future changes. If anybody
sees something missing, just let me know, and I'll take it up for the
next review round.
--mtx
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287
Powered by blists - more mailing lists