[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190717154018.GL32439@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:40:18 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] perf stat: always separate stalled cycles per insn
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 05:43:24PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:24:41PM -0700, Cong Wang escreveu:
> > Hi, Arnaldo
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:11 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > <arnaldo.melo@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Em Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:21:38AM -0700, Cong Wang escreveu:
> > > > Thanks for reviewing it. Is there anyone takes this patch?
> > >
> > > Enough time, acked already, picking it.
> >
> > Where is this patch landed? I don't see it in Linus tree. I guess you
> > are still holding it somewhere?
>
> Got it now, will push upstream in the next batch, sorry for the delay.
FWIW i would prefer to deprecate the stalled cycles metrics. They
are confusing and misleading. --topdown FrontendBound is a much
better metric.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists