[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wipjStEwJj2_iWxBdVC4oV8rY5NjrRb1tmWLUa0VrS_Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:41:49 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MIPS changes
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:25 AM Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com> wrote:
>
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst suggests to me that the version
> in the MIPS tree is correct in terms of license name ("GPL-2.0" without
> the "-only" suffix) whilst the version in master is correct in terms of
> comment style ("/* */" rather than "//").
It's actually license-rules.rst that just hasn't been updated. The
"GPL-.2.0" and "GPL-2.0+" naming was considered too terse, so the
modern spdx tag suggestions are "GPL-2.0-only" and "GPL-2.0-or-later".
The full list of all spdx license tags (many of which aren't relevant
for the kernel, of course) can be found at
https://spdx.org/licenses/
in case you care.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists