Message-ID: <055457fd-621b-6c93-b671-d5e5380698c6@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jul 2019 19:35:49 -0700
From:   Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>
CC:     <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        <marc.zyngier@....com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <stefan@...er.ch>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <jckuo@...dia.com>,
        <talho@...dia.com>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
        <spatra@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 11/18] clk: tegra210: Add support for Tegra210 clocks


On 7/16/19 7:18 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>
> On 7/16/19 3:06 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>
>> On 7/16/19 3:00 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 17.07.2019 0:35, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>> On 7/16/19 2:21 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> 17.07.2019 0:12, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>> On 7/16/19 1:47 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>> 16.07.2019 22:26, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>> On 7/16/19 11:43 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 16.07.2019 21:30, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/16/19 11:25 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 16.07.2019 21:19, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/16/19 9:50 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/16/19 8:00 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16.07.2019 11:06, Peter De Schrijver пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 03:24:26PM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, Will add to CPUFreq driver...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The other thing that also need attention is that T124
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUFreq
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driver
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicitly relies on DFLL driver to be probed first,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> icky.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should I add check for successful dfll clk register
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explicitly in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUFreq driver probe and defer till dfll clk registers?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably you should use the "device links". See [1][2] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2.1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c#L2383 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/driver-api/device_link.html 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Return EPROBE_DEFER instead of EINVAL if device_link_add()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fails.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use of_find_device_by_node() to get the DFLL's device, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see [3].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/devfreq/tegra20-devfreq.c#n100 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will go thru and add...
>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like I initially confused this case with getting orphaned
>>>>>>>>>>> clock.
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm now seeing that the DFLL driver registers the clock and 
>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>> clk_get(dfll) should be returning EPROBE_DEFER until DFLL 
>>>>>>>>>>> driver is
>>>>>>>>>>> probed, hence everything should be fine as-is and there is 
>>>>>>>>>>> no real
>>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>> for the 'device link'. Sorry for the confusion!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I didn't follow the mail thread. Just regarding the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFLL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you know it, the DFLL clock is one of the CPU clock
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated with DVFS control logic with the regulator. We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU to other clock sources once we switched to DFLL.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been regulated by the DFLL HW with the DVFS table (CVB 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or OPP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> table
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the driver.). We shouldn't reparent it to other sources
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unknew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freq/volt pair. That's not guaranteed to work. We allow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switching to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open-loop mode but different sources.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, then the CPUFreq driver will have to enforce DFLL 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freq to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PLLP's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate before switching to PLLP in order to have a proper CPU
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voltage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PLLP freq is safe to work for any CPU voltage. So no need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforce
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFLL freq to PLLP rate before changing CCLK_G source to PLLP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, please ignore my above comment. During suspend, need to
>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>>> CCLK_G source to PLLP when dfll is in closed loop mode 
>>>>>>>>>>>> first and
>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>> dfll need to be set to open loop.
>>>>>>>>>>> Okay.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I don't exactly understand why we need to switch to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PLLP in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idle
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driver. Just keep it on CL-DVFS mode all the time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In SC7 entry, the dfll suspend function moves it the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open-loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode. That's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all. The sc7-entryfirmware will handle the rest of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sequence to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn off
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CPU power.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In SC7 resume, the warmboot code will handle the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sequence to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regulator and power up the CPU cluster. And leave it on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PLL_P.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resuming to the kernel, we re-init DFLL, restore the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU clock
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> policy (CPU
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runs on DFLL open-loop mode) and then moving to close-loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The DFLL is re-inited after switching CCLK to DFLL parent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early clocks-state restoring by CaR driver. Hence instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> odd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hacks in the CaR driver, it is much nicer to have a proper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspend-resume sequencing of the device drivers. In this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUFreq
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driver is the driver that enables DFLL and switches CPU 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clock
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source, which means that this driver is also should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> management of the DFLL's state during of suspend/resume
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUFreq driver disables DFLL during suspend and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-enables it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resume, then looks like the CaR driver hacks around DFLL 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The DFLL part looks good to me. BTW, change the patch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspend-resume support" seems more appropriate to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To clarify this, the sequences for DFLL use are as follows
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (assuming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required DFLL hw configuration has been done)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Switch to DFLL:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0) Save current parent and frequency
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Program DFLL to open loop mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Enable DFLL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Change cclk_g parent to DFLL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For OVR regulator:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Change PWM output pin from tristate to output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5) Enable DFLL PWM output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For I2C regulator:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Enable DFLL I2C output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6) Program DFLL to closed loop mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Switch away from DFLL:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0) Change cclk_g parent to PLLP so the CPU frequency is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vdd_cpu voltage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Program DFLL to open loop mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see during switch away from DFLL (suspend), cclk_g parent 
>>>>>>>>>>>> is not
>>>>>>>>>>>> changed to PLLP before changing dfll to open loop mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Will add this ...
>>>>>>>>>>> The CPUFreq driver switches parent to PLLP during the probe,
>>>>>>>>>>> similar
>>>>>>>>>>> should be done on suspend.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm also wondering if it's always safe to switch to PLLP in the
>>>>>>>>>>> probe.
>>>>>>>>>>> If CPU is running on a lower freq than PLLP, then some other 
>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate intermediate parent should be selected.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> CPU parents are PLL_X, PLL_P, and dfll. PLL_X always runs at 
>>>>>>>>>> higher
>>>>>>>>>> rate
>>>>>>>>>> so switching to PLL_P during CPUFreq probe prior to dfll clock
>>>>>>>>>> enable
>>>>>>>>>> should be safe.
>>>>>>>>> AFAIK, PLLX could run at ~200MHz. There is also a divided 
>>>>>>>>> output of
>>>>>>>>> PLLP
>>>>>>>>> which CCLKG supports, the PLLP_OUT4.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Probably, realistically, CPU is always running off a fast PLLX 
>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>> boot, but I'm wondering what may happen on KEXEC. I guess ideally
>>>>>>>>> CPUFreq driver should also have a 'shutdown' callback to teardown
>>>>>>>>> DFLL
>>>>>>>>> on a reboot, but likely that there are other clock-related
>>>>>>>>> problems as
>>>>>>>>> well that may break KEXEC and thus it is not very important at 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> moment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>> During bootup CPUG sources from PLL_X. By PLL_P source above I 
>>>>>>>> meant
>>>>>>>> PLL_P_OUT4.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As per clock policies, PLL_X is always used for high freq like 
>>>>>>>> >800Mhz
>>>>>>>> and for low frequency it will be sourced from PLLP.
>>>>>>> Alright, then please don't forget to pre-initialize PLLP_OUT4 
>>>>>>> rate to a
>>>>>>> reasonable value using tegra_clk_init_table or assigned-clocks.
>>>>>> PLLP_OUT4 rate update is not needed as it is safe to run at 408Mhz
>>>>>> because it is below fmax @ Vmin
>>>>> So even 204MHz CVB entries are having the same voltage as 408MHz,
>>>>> correct? It's not instantly obvious to me from the DFLL driver's code
>>>>> where the fmax @ Vmin is defined, I see that there is the 
>>>>> min_millivolts
>>>>> and frequency entries starting from 204MHZ defined per-table.
>>>> Yes at Vmin CPU Fmax is ~800Mhz. So anything below that will work at
>>>> Vmin voltage and PLLP max is 408Mhz.
>>> Thank you for the clarification. It would be good to have that 
>>> commented
>>> in the code as well.
>> OK, Will add...
>
> Regarding, adding suspend/resume to CPUFreq, CPUFreq suspend happens 
> very early even before disabling non-boot CPUs and also need to export 
> clock driver APIs to CPUFreq.
>
> Was thinking of below way of implementing this...
>
>
> Clock DFLL driver Suspend:
>
>         - Save CPU clock policy registers, and Perform dfll suspend 
> which sets in open loop mode
>
> CPU Freq driver Suspend: does nothing
>
>
> Clock DFLL driver Resume:
>
>         - Re-init DFLL, Set in Open-Loop mode, restore CPU Clock 
> policy registers which actually sets source to DFLL along with other 
>         CPU Policy register restore.
>
> CPU Freq driver Resume:
>
>         - do clk_prepare_enable which acutally sets DFLL in Closed 
> loop mode
>
>
> Adding one more note: Switching CPU Clock to PLLP is not needed as CPU 
> CLock can be from dfll in open-loop mode as DFLL is not disabled 
> anywhere throught the suspend/resume path and SC7 entry FW and Warm 
> boot code will switch CPU source to PLLP.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists