| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACjz--m8BuJbe80m7HfakVi8uXj5mTj72=6YZ5+OAa-gF29M8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:03:02 -0700
From: Ryan Case <ryandcase@...omium.org>
To: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com, eddie.huang@...iatek.com,
cawa.cheng@...iatek.com, bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com,
stonea168@....com
Subject: Re: [v5 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 6:43 PM CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Jitao:
>
> On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 16:01 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> > Change the method of frame rate calc which can get more accurate
> > frame rate.
> >
> > data rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel / lanes
> > Adjust hfp_wc to adapt the additional phy_data
> >
> > if MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
> > hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12 - 6;
> > else
> > hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12;
> >
> > Note:
> > //(2: 1 for sync, 1 for phy idle)
> > data_phy_cycles = T_hs_exit + T_lpx + T_hs_prepare + T_hs_zero + 2;
> >
> > bpp: bit per pixel
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
> > Tested-by: Ryan Case <ryandcase@...omium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
>
> This version is different than previous version, so you should remove
> Reviewed-by tag. For this version, I still give you a
>
> Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > index 1621e8cdacc2..cefdcb1509cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > @@ -144,12 +144,6 @@
> > #define DATA_0 (0xff << 16)
> > #define DATA_1 (0xff << 24)
> >
> > -#define T_LPX 5
> > -#define T_HS_PREP 6
> > -#define T_HS_TRAIL 8
> > -#define T_HS_EXIT 7
> > -#define T_HS_ZERO 10
> > -
> > #define NS_TO_CYCLE(n, c) ((n) / (c) + (((n) % (c)) ? 1 : 0))
> >
> > #define MTK_DSI_HOST_IS_READ(type) \
> > @@ -158,6 +152,25 @@
> > (type == MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_READ_REQUEST_2_PARAM) || \
> > (type == MIPI_DSI_DCS_READ))
> >
> > +struct mtk_phy_timing {
> > + u32 lpx;
> > + u32 da_hs_prepare;
> > + u32 da_hs_zero;
> > + u32 da_hs_trail;
> > +
> > + u32 ta_go;
> > + u32 ta_sure;
> > + u32 ta_get;
> > + u32 da_hs_exit;
> > +
> > + u32 clk_hs_zero;
> > + u32 clk_hs_trail;
> > +
> > + u32 clk_hs_prepare;
> > + u32 clk_hs_post;
> > + u32 clk_hs_exit;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct phy;
> >
> > struct mtk_dsi_driver_data {
> > @@ -188,6 +201,7 @@ struct mtk_dsi {
> > enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format format;
> > unsigned int lanes;
> > struct videomode vm;
> > + struct mtk_phy_timing phy_timing;
> > int refcount;
> > bool enabled;
> > u32 irq_data;
> > @@ -221,17 +235,36 @@ static void mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > {
> > u32 timcon0, timcon1, timcon2, timcon3;
> > u32 ui, cycle_time;
> > + struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
> > +
> > + ui = 1000000000 / dsi->data_rate;
> > + cycle_time = div_u64(8000000000ULL, dsi->data_rate);
> > +
> > + timing->lpx = NS_TO_CYCLE(60, cycle_time);
> > + timing->da_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(40 + 5 * ui, cycle_time);
> > + timing->da_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(110 + 6 * ui, cycle_time);
> > + timing->da_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 4 * ui, cycle_time);
> >
> > - ui = 1000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
> > - cycle_time = 8000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
> > + timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx;
> > + timing->ta_sure = 3 * timing->lpx / 2;
> > + timing->ta_get = 5 * timing->lpx;
> > + timing->da_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
> >
> > - timcon0 = T_LPX | T_HS_PREP << 8 | T_HS_ZERO << 16 | T_HS_TRAIL << 24;
> > - timcon1 = 4 * T_LPX | (3 * T_LPX / 2) << 8 | 5 * T_LPX << 16 |
> > - T_HS_EXIT << 24;
> > - timcon2 = ((NS_TO_CYCLE(0x64, cycle_time) + 0xa) << 24) |
> > - (NS_TO_CYCLE(0x150, cycle_time) << 16);
> > - timcon3 = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x40, cycle_time) | (2 * T_LPX) << 16 |
> > - NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time) << 8;
> > + timing->clk_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(336, cycle_time);
> > + timing->clk_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(100, cycle_time) + 10;
> > +
> > + timing->clk_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(64, cycle_time);
> > + timing->clk_hs_post = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time);
> > + timing->clk_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
> > +
> > + timcon0 = timing->lpx | timing->da_hs_prepare << 8 |
> > + timing->da_hs_zero << 16 | timing->da_hs_trail << 24;
> > + timcon1 = timing->ta_go | timing->ta_sure << 8 |
> > + timing->ta_get << 16 | timing->da_hs_exit << 24;
> > + timcon2 = 1 << 8 | timing->clk_hs_zero << 16 |
> > + timing->clk_hs_trail << 24;
> > + timcon3 = timing->clk_hs_prepare | timing->clk_hs_post << 8 |
> > + timing->clk_hs_exit << 16;
> >
> > writel(timcon0, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON0);
> > writel(timcon1, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON1);
> > @@ -418,7 +451,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
> > u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > - u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > + u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > + struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
> >
> > struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> >
> > @@ -445,7 +479,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
> >
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte = (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 12);
> > + data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 2;
> > +
> > + if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > + if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > + data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > + data_phy_cycles *
> > + dsi->lanes - 18;
> > + } else {
> > + DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > + data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > + data_phy_cycles *
> > + dsi->lanes - 12;
> > + } else {
> > + DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
> > writel(horizontal_backporch_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HBP_WC);
> > @@ -545,8 +606,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = dsi->->host.dev;
> > int ret;
> > - u64 pixel_clock, total_bits;
> > - u32 htotal, htotal_bits, bit_per_pixel, overhead_cycles, overhead_bits;
> > + u32 bit_per_pixel;
> >
> > if (++dsi->refcount != 1)
> > return 0;
> > @@ -565,24 +625,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - /**
> > - * htotal_time = htotal * byte_per_pixel / num_lanes
> > - * overhead_time = lpx + hs_prepare + hs_zero + hs_trail + hs_exit
> > - * mipi_ratio = (htotal_time + overhead_time) / htotal_time
> > - * data_rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel * mipi_ratio / num_lanes;
> > - */
> > - pixel_clock = dsi->vm.pixelclock;
> > - htotal = dsi->vm.hactive + dsi->vm.hback_porch + dsi->vm.hfront_porch +
> > - dsi->vm.hsync_len;
> > - htotal_bits = htotal * bit_per_pixel;
> > -
> > - overhead_cycles = T_LPX + T_HS_PREP + T_HS_ZERO + T_HS_TRAIL +
> > - T_HS_EXIT;
> > - overhead_bits = overhead_cycles * dsi->lanes * 8;
> > - total_bits = htotal_bits + overhead_bits;
> > -
> > - dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pixel_clock * total_bits,
> > - htotal * dsi->lanes);
> > + dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dsi->vm.pixelclock * bit_per_pixel, dsi->lanes);
nit: Wrap this line, it's over 80 characters.
> >
> > ret = clk_set_rate(dsi->hs_clk, dsi->data_rate);
> > if (ret < 0) {
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists