[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06b1e979-3ac6-1f3c-616f-5756ac16519b@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 05:34:53 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bp@...en8.de, sstabellini@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] x86/paravirt: Remove const mark from
x86_hyper_xen_hvm variable
On 17.07.19 04:09, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>
> On 2019/7/16 18:57, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 11.07.19 14:02, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> .. as "nopv" support needs it to be changeable at boot up stage.
>>>
>>> Checkpatch report warning, so move variable declarations from
>>> hypervisor.c to hypervisor.h
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
>>> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>>> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h | 8 ++++++++
>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c | 8 --------
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h
>>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h
>>> index f7b4c53..e41cbf2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h
>>> @@ -58,6 +58,14 @@ struct hypervisor_x86 {
>>> bool ignore_nopv;
>>> };
>>> +extern const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_vmware;
>>> +extern const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_ms_hyperv;
>>> +extern const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_xen_pv;
>>> +extern const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_kvm;
>>> +extern const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_jailhouse;
>>> +extern const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_acrn;
>>> +extern struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_xen_hvm;
>>
>> This should either stay const and be changed in patch 5, or you
>> should adapt its definition in arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c in
>> this patch.
>
> Ok, thanks for your suggestion.
>
> I'll choose 2nd opinion as I don't need to change descripton with that.
Just resend the last two modified patches then, please.
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists