lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5279c745-f703-7037-766e-9874648a5de3@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:13:26 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
        dbueso@...e.de, mingo@...hat.com, jade.alglave@....com,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rwsem: Add missing ACQUIRE to read_slowpath sleep
 loop

On 7/18/19 9:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> While reviewing another read_slowpath patch, both Will and I noticed
> another missing ACQUIRE, namely:
>
>   X = 0;
>
>   CPU0			CPU1
>
>   rwsem_down_read()
>     for (;;) {
>       set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>
>                         X = 1;
>                         rwsem_up_write();
>                           rwsem_mark_wake()
>                             atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count);
>                             smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL);
>
>       if (!waiter.task)
>         break;
>
>       ...
>     }
>
>   r = X;
>
> Allows 'r == 0'.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
>  kernel/locking/rwsem.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -1069,8 +1069,10 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semap
>  	/* wait to be given the lock */
>  	while (true) {
>  		set_current_state(state);
> -		if (!waiter.task)
> +		if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter.task)) {
> +			/* Orders against rwsem_mark_wake()'s smp_store_release() */
>  			break;
> +		}
>  		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
>  			raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
>  			if (waiter.task)
>
>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>

Thanks for fixing this old problem.

This problem does not apply to x86 and we do our testing mostly on x86.
That is why we seldom notice this kind of issue. Maybe we should be
doing more testing on ARM64 and PPC.

Cheers,
Longman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ