lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:04:38 +0800
From:   luferry@....com
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luferry <luferry@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] smp: avoid generic_exec_single cause system lockup

From: luferry <luferry@....com>

The race can reproduced by sending wait enabled IPI in softirq/irq env

src cpu only send ipi when dst cpu with queue empty, if interrupts
disturbed between llist_add and send_ipi. Interrupt handler may raise
softirq.In irq env, if src cpu try send_ipi to same dst cpu with
wait enabled. Since dst cpu's queue is not empty, src cpu won't send
ipi and dst cpu won't be waked up. src cpu will stall in
csd_lock_wait(csd). Which may cause soft lockup or hard lockup depends on
which time other cpus do send IPI to dst cpu.

So just send IPI when wait enabled and in_interrupt()

if (llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
	// src cpu got interrupt here
     arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);

CPU0                                   CPU1

kernel env:smp_call_function         call_single_queue empty
kernel env:llist_add
                                       call_single_queue got csd
get interrupt
raise softirq
irq env:smp_call_function with wait
irq env:llist_add
irq env:queue not empty and skip send ipi
irq env:waiting for csd execution

Signed-off-by: luferry <luferry@....com>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index d155374632eb..de31a49b9fa7 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -142,9 +142,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(call_single_data_t, csd_data);
 static int generic_exec_single(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd,
 			       smp_call_func_t func, void *info)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
-		unsigned long flags;
-
 		/*
 		 * We can unlock early even for the synchronous on-stack case,
 		 * since we're doing this from the same CPU..
@@ -176,8 +175,10 @@ static int generic_exec_single(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd,
 	 * locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
 	 * equipped to do the right thing...
 	 */
+	local_irq_save(flags);
 	if (llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
 		arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.14.1.40.g8e62ba1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ