[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <035c38f7eac845281d3c3d36749144982e06e58c.1563413318.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:36:46 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/22] objtool: Add mcsafe_handle_tail() to the uaccess safe list
After an objtool improvement, it's reporting that __memcpy_mcsafe() is
calling mcsafe_handle_tail() with AC=1:
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool: .fixup+0x13: call to mcsafe_handle_tail() with UACCESS enabled
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool: __memcpy_mcsafe()+0x34: (alt)
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool: __memcpy_mcsafe()+0xb: (branch)
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool: __memcpy_mcsafe()+0x0: <=== (func)
mcsafe_handle_tail() is basically an extension of __memcpy_mcsafe(), so
AC=1 is supposed to be set. Add mcsafe_handle_tail() to the uaccess
safe list.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 27818a93f0b1..fd8827114c74 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ static const char *uaccess_safe_builtin[] = {
/* misc */
"csum_partial_copy_generic",
"__memcpy_mcsafe",
+ "mcsafe_handle_tail",
"ftrace_likely_update", /* CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING */
NULL
};
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists