[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdeb0dfb-0237-58d6-be6e-b2499c95966c@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:56:02 +0000
From: "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>
To: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
CC: "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/ttm: use the same attributes when freeing
d_page->vaddr
Am 18.07.19 um 09:21 schrieb Fuqian Huang:
> Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@....com> 於 2019年7月16日週二 下午9:38寫道:
>> Am 11.07.19 um 05:10 schrieb Fuqian Huang:
>>> In function __ttm_dma_alloc_page(), d_page->addr is allocated
>>> by dma_alloc_attrs() but freed with use dma_free_coherent() in
>>> __ttm_dma_free_page().
>>> Use the correct dma_free_attrs() to free d_page->vaddr.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
>>
>> How do you want to upstream that? Should I pull it into our tree?
> I just came across this misuse case accidentally.
> I am not very clear about 'How to upstream that'.
> Are there more than one way to upstream the code and fix the problem?
Well I can add it to the TTM tree which send to David or it could be
pulled through some other way towards Linus.
> From my side, it is ok that you pull it into your tree and fix it or
> fix it in other way.
> :) It will be fine if the problem is fixed.
Ok, fine with me :)
Christian.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c | 6 +++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
>>> index d594f7520b7b..7d78e6deac89 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
>>> @@ -285,9 +285,13 @@ static int ttm_set_pages_caching(struct dma_pool *pool,
>>>
>>> static void __ttm_dma_free_page(struct dma_pool *pool, struct dma_page *d_page)
>>> {
>>> + unsigned long attrs = 0;
>>> dma_addr_t dma = d_page->dma;
>>> d_page->vaddr &= ~VADDR_FLAG_HUGE_POOL;
>>> - dma_free_coherent(pool->dev, pool->size, (void *)d_page->vaddr, dma);
>>> + if (pool->type & IS_HUGE)
>>> + attrs = DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN;
>>> +
>>> + dma_free_attrs(pool->dev, pool->size, (void *)d_page->vaddr, dma, attrs);
>>>
>>> kfree(d_page);
>>> d_page = NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists