[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4854b0f7-6a81-bc87-3e63-d2b7c68a44f6@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:44:01 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
leo.yan@...aro.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
mike.leach@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, mark.rutland@....com
Cc: rnayak@...eaurora.org, vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org,
sibis@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add Coresight support
Hi Suzuki,
On 7/18/2019 1:58 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Sai,
>
>
> etr@...8000 {
>> + compatible = "arm,coresight-tmc", "arm,primecell";
>> + reg = <0x06048000 0x1000>;
>> +
>> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK>, <&rpmcc
>> RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "apb_pclk", "atclk";
>> + arm,scatter-gather;
>
> Please could you confirm that you have tested the scatter-gather mode
> with ETR ? Either via perf/sysfs. Please could you share your results ?
> Unless verified
> this is going to be fatal for the system.
>
> Similarly for other platforms.
>
Yes I have tested with scatter-gather mode with ETR on all platforms
which I have posted via sysfs(not perf) before on previous versions of
this patch series and no issues were found. And I suppose this was
discussed in v2 of this patch series [1].
As said in one of the series initially [1], QCOM msm downstream kernels
have been using scatter gather mode and we haven't seen any fatal issues.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10769535/
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists