[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpc26yL6rOnfwawL=eL649NsgTMrF1WrMHZv7AVd=3PCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:48:14 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Raju P . L . S . S . S . N" <rplsssn@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Souvik Chakravarty <souvik.chakravarty@....com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: dts: hikey: Convert to the hierarchical CPU
topology layout
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 16:47, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 09:23:00PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > To enable the OS to manage last-man standing activities for a CPU, while an
> > idle state for a group of CPUs is selected, let's convert the Hikey
> > platform into using the hierarchical CPU topology layout.
> >
> > Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes:
> > - None.
> >
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> > index 108e2a4227f6..36ff460f428f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> > cpus {
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -70,9 +128,8 @@
> > };
> >
> > CLUSTER_SLEEP: cluster-sleep {
> > - compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> > - local-timer-stop;
> > - arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1010000>;
> > + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> > + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1000000>;
> > entry-latency-us = <1000>;
> > exit-latency-us = <700>;
> > min-residency-us = <2700>;
>
> Again this must be original format and as per PSCI spec, your patch
> changes this cluster sleep state into cluster retention state which I
> think is not what you intended.
If the hierarchical topology is used, the parameter for cluster states
are ORed with the deepest idle state for the CPU.
CPU_SLEEP: 0x0010000
CLUSTER_SLEEP: 0x1000000
After the ORed operation
CLUSTER_SLEEP: 0x1010000
So, this indeed works as expected.
However, are you saying that ORing the state parameters like above has
other problems? I am reading your other replies...
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists