[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1563449947-7749-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 19:39:07 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM:390: Use kvm_vcpu_wake_up in kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Use kvm_vcpu_wake_up() in kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup().
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 15 +--------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 26f8bf4..881cc5a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -1229,21 +1229,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* in kvm_vcpu_block without having the waitqueue set (polling)
*/
vcpu->valid_wakeup = true;
- /*
- * This is mostly to document, that the read in swait_active could
- * be moved before other stores, leading to subtle races.
- * All current users do not store or use an atomic like update
- */
- smp_mb__after_atomic();
- if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq)) {
- /*
- * The vcpu gave up the cpu voluntarily, mark it as a good
- * yield-candidate.
- */
+ if (kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu))
vcpu->ready = true;
- swake_up_one(&vcpu->wq);
- vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup++;
- }
/*
* The VCPU might not be sleeping but is executing the VSIE. Let's
* kick it, so it leaves the SIE to process the request.
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists