lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190718125703.GA28332@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:57:03 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: hide iomap_sector with CONFIG_BLOCK=n

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 02:55:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When CONFIG_BLOCK is disabled, SECTOR_SHIFT is unknown:
> 
> In file included from <built-in>:3:
> include/linux/iomap.h:76:48: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SECTOR_SHIFT'
>         return (iomap->addr + pos - iomap->offset) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> 
> Since there are no callers in this case, just hide the function in
> the same ifdef.
> 
> Fixes: db074436f421 ("iomap: move the direct IO code into a separate file")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Can we just not include iomap.c when CONFIG_BLOCK is not set?
Which file do you see this with?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ