[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190718125703.GA28332@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:57:03 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: hide iomap_sector with CONFIG_BLOCK=n
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 02:55:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When CONFIG_BLOCK is disabled, SECTOR_SHIFT is unknown:
>
> In file included from <built-in>:3:
> include/linux/iomap.h:76:48: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SECTOR_SHIFT'
> return (iomap->addr + pos - iomap->offset) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
>
> Since there are no callers in this case, just hide the function in
> the same ifdef.
>
> Fixes: db074436f421 ("iomap: move the direct IO code into a separate file")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Can we just not include iomap.c when CONFIG_BLOCK is not set?
Which file do you see this with?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists