[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo5S=VyyV6Euzf7qhO0zukU_mnXqJgEhy9fwR0AYf4LTpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:58:52 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, daniel@...ll.ch,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Prefer pcie_capability_read_word()
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 9:08 PM Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com> wrote:
>
> Commit 8c0d3a02c130 ("PCI: Add accessors for PCI Express Capability")
> added accessors for the PCI Express Capability so that drivers didn't
> need to be aware of differences between v1 and v2 of the PCI
> Express Capability.
>
> Replace pci_read_config_word() and pci_write_config_word() calls with
> pcie_capability_read_word() and pcie_capability_write_word().
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com>
> - pci_read_config_word(adev->pdev, gpu_pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, &tmp16);
> + pcie_capability_read_word(adev->pdev,
> + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2,
> + &tmp16);
> tmp16 &= ~((1 << 4) | (7 << 9));
> tmp16 |= (gpu_cfg2 & ((1 << 4) | (7 << 9)));
Same comments as for radeon. Looks like a lot of similar code between
radeon and amdgpu.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists