linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: Boosting vCPUs that are delivering interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c4c23d93-879b-1783-afa5-b6e053f32990@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:30:17 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: Boosting vCPUs that are delivering interrupts

On 18/07/19 13:39, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> -	if (kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu))
> +	if (kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu)) {
> +		vcpu->ready = true;
>  		return;
> +	}

Why here and not in kvm_vcpu_wake_up (which would allow further
simplification of s390 code)?

Paolo

Paolo