[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ba72e56-9f62-36bf-ded7-f337522715d5@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:01:17 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, mhocko@...nel.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 2/2] mm: mempolicy: handle vma with unmovable pages
mapped correctly in mbind
On 7/18/19 7:17 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> When running syzkaller internally, we ran into the below bug on 4.9.x
> kernel:
>
> kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2124!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
> Dumping ftrace buffer:
> (ftrace buffer empty)
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 1518 Comm: syz-executor107 Not tainted 4.9.168+ #2
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
> task: ffff880067b34900 task.stack: ffff880068998000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81895d6b>] [<ffffffff81895d6b>] split_huge_page_to_list+0x8fb/0x1030 mm/huge_memory.c:2124
> RSP: 0018:ffff88006899f980 EFLAGS: 00010286
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea00018f1700 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: 1ffffd400031e2e7 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffea00018f1738
> RBP: ffff88006899f9e8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fffffbfff0d8b13e R12: ffffea00018f1400
> R13: ffffea00018f1400 R14: ffffea00018f1720 R15: ffffea00018f1401
> FS: 00007fa333996740(0000) GS:ffff88006c600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000020000040 CR3: 0000000066b9c000 CR4: 00000000000606f0
> Stack:
> 0000000000000246 ffff880067b34900 0000000000000000 ffff88007ffdc000
> 0000000000000000 ffff88006899f9e8 ffffffff812b4015 ffff880064c64e18
> ffffea00018f1401 dffffc0000000000 ffffea00018f1700 0000000020ffd000
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff818490f1>] split_huge_page include/linux/huge_mm.h:100 [inline]
> [<ffffffff818490f1>] queue_pages_pte_range+0x7e1/0x1480 mm/mempolicy.c:538
> [<ffffffff817ed0da>] walk_pmd_range mm/pagewalk.c:50 [inline]
> [<ffffffff817ed0da>] walk_pud_range mm/pagewalk.c:90 [inline]
> [<ffffffff817ed0da>] walk_pgd_range mm/pagewalk.c:116 [inline]
> [<ffffffff817ed0da>] __walk_page_range+0x44a/0xdb0 mm/pagewalk.c:208
> [<ffffffff817edb94>] walk_page_range+0x154/0x370 mm/pagewalk.c:285
> [<ffffffff81844515>] queue_pages_range+0x115/0x150 mm/mempolicy.c:694
> [<ffffffff8184f493>] do_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1241 [inline]
> [<ffffffff8184f493>] SYSC_mbind+0x3c3/0x1030 mm/mempolicy.c:1370
> [<ffffffff81850146>] SyS_mbind+0x46/0x60 mm/mempolicy.c:1352
> [<ffffffff810097e2>] do_syscall_64+0x1d2/0x600 arch/x86/entry/common.c:282
> [<ffffffff82ff6f93>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb
> Code: c7 80 1c 02 00 e8 26 0a 76 01 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 40 46 45 84 e8 4c
> RIP [<ffffffff81895d6b>] split_huge_page_to_list+0x8fb/0x1030 mm/huge_memory.c:2124
> RSP <ffff88006899f980>
...
> @@ -532,7 +531,14 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> has_unmovable |= true;
> break;
> }
> - migrate_page_add(page, qp->pagelist, flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * Do not abort immediately since there may be
> + * temporary off LRU pages in the range. Still
> + * need migrate other LRU pages.
> + */
> + if (migrate_page_add(page, qp->pagelist, flags))
> + has_unmovable |= true;
Also = instead of |=
> } else
> break;
> }
> @@ -961,10 +967,21 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy, nodemask_t *nmask,
> /*
> * page migration, thp tail pages can be passed.
> */
> -static void migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist,
> +static int migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist,
> unsigned long flags)
> {
> struct page *head = compound_head(page);
> +
> + /*
> + * Non-movable page may reach here. And, there may be
> + * temporary off LRU pages or non-LRU movable pages.
> + * Treat them as unmovable pages since they can't be
> + * isolated, so they can't be moved at the moment. It
> + * should return -EIO for this case too.
> + */
> + if (!PageLRU(head) && (flags & MPOL_MF_STRICT))
> + return -EIO;
As this test is racy, why not just use the result of isolate_lru_page().
> +
> /*
> * Avoid migrating a page that is shared with others.
> */
> @@ -976,6 +993,8 @@ static void migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist,
> hpage_nr_pages(head));
> }
> }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* page allocation callback for NUMA node migration */
> @@ -1178,9 +1197,10 @@ static struct page *new_page(struct page *page, unsigned long start)
> }
> #else
>
> -static void migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist,
> +static int migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist,
> unsigned long flags)
> {
> + return -EIO;
> }
>
> int do_migrate_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, const nodemask_t *from,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists