[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <879a196a-1d92-931d-88f4-6ce17a09cf20@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:12:33 +0000
From: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers
On 7/18/19 2:44 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Lendacky, Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@....com> writes:
>
>> On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate
>>> patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a fix in
>>> patch 1 which wasn't selecting ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT for s390 spotted by
>>> Janani and removal of sme_active and sev_active symbol exports as suggested
>>> by Christoph Hellwig.
>>>
>>> These patches are applied on top of today's dma-mapping/for-next.
>>>
>>> I don't have a way to test SME, SEV, nor s390's PEF so the patches have only
>>> been build tested.
>>
>> I'll try and get this tested quickly to be sure everything works for SME
>> and SEV.
Built and tested both SME and SEV and everything appears to be working
well (not extensive testing, but should be good enough).
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Thanks! And thanks for reviewing the patches.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists