linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v1] pidfd: fix a race in setting exit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJWu+orxkFyoTTmFJs23FD0PKX-NetF4kVVLXnWkyLdCU2_cYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:51:20 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1] pidfd: fix a race in setting exit_state for pidfd polling

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:27 PM Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 06:14:05PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > it seems that I missed something else...
> >
> > On 07/17, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -1156,10 +1157,11 @@ static int wait_task_zombie(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
> > >             ptrace_unlink(p);
> > >
> > >             /* If parent wants a zombie, don't release it now */
> > > -           state = EXIT_ZOMBIE;
> > > +           p->exit_state = EXIT_ZOMBIE;
> > >             if (do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal))
> > > -                   state = EXIT_DEAD;
> > > -           p->exit_state = state;
> > > +                   p->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD;
> > > +
> > > +           state = p->exit_state;
> > >             write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> >
> > why do you think we also need to change wait_task_zombie() ?
> >
> > pidfd_poll() only needs the exit_state != 0 check, we know that it
> > is not zero at this point. Why do we need to change exit_state before
> > do_notify_parent() ?
>
> Oh, because of?:
>
>         /*
>          * Move the task's state to DEAD/TRACE, only one thread can do this.
>          */
>         state = (ptrace_reparented(p) && thread_group_leader(p)) ?
>                 EXIT_TRACE : EXIT_DEAD;
>         if (cmpxchg(&p->exit_state, EXIT_ZOMBIE, state) != EXIT_ZOMBIE)
>                 return 0;
>
> So exit_state will definitely be set in this scenario. Good point.
>

Agreed. Christian, do you mind dropping this hunk from the patch or do
you want me to resend the patch with the hunk dropped?