[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQrPRKUCbTY9pSWrUTw=kshhE2CSz5jqXOuD7ziChdsGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:16:55 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: hide iomap_sector with CONFIG_BLOCK=n
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:59 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:19:15AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > I started to think
> > compiling all headers is more painful than useful.
> >
> >
> > MW is closing, so I am thinking of disabling it for now
> > to take time to re-think.
>
> For now this seems like the best idea. In the long run maybe we can
> limit the tests to certain configs, e.g.
>
>
> headers-$(CONFIG_IOMAP) += iomap.h
I cannot find CONFIG_IOMAP.
Do you mean
header-test-$(CONFIG_BLOCK) += iomap.h
?
> in include/linux/Kbuild
>
> and base it off that?
Yes, I was thinking of that.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists