| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:39:48 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.ibm.com, andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: Implement DRW lock
A (D)ouble (R)eader (W)riter lock is a locking primitive that allows
to have multiple readers or multiple writers but not multiple readers
and writers holding it concurrently. The code is factored out from
the existing open-coded locking scheme used to exclude pending
snapshots from nocow writers and vice-versa. Current implementation
actually favors Readers (that is snapshot creaters) to writers (nocow
writers of the filesystem).
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 +
fs/btrfs/locking.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/btrfs/locking.h | 20 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index da97ff10f421..b7c9359b24a0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include "extent_map.h"
#include "async-thread.h"
#include "block-rsv.h"
+#include "locking.h"
struct btrfs_trans_handle;
struct btrfs_transaction;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
index 98fccce4208c..702c956ed028 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
@@ -354,3 +354,91 @@ void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
write_unlock(&eb->lock);
}
}
+
+
+int btrfs_drw_lock_init(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = percpu_counter_init(&lock->writers, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ atomic_set(&lock->readers, 0);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&lock->pending_readers);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&lock->pending_writers);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(btrfs_drw_lock_init);
+
+void btrfs_drw_lock_destroy(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock)
+{
+ percpu_counter_destroy(&lock->writers);
+}
+
+bool btrfs_drw_try_write_lock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock)
+{
+ if (atomic_read(&lock->readers))
+ return false;
+
+ percpu_counter_inc(&lock->writers);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure writers count is updated before we check for
+ * pending readers
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ if (atomic_read(&lock->readers)) {
+ btrfs_drw_write_unlock(lock);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(btrfs_drw_try_write_lock);
+
+void btrfs_drw_write_lock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock)
+{
+ while (true) {
+ if (btrfs_drw_try_write_lock(lock))
+ return;
+ wait_event(lock->pending_writers, !atomic_read(&lock->readers));
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(btrfs_drw_write_lock);
+
+void btrfs_drw_write_unlock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock)
+{
+ percpu_counter_dec(&lock->writers);
+ cond_wake_up(&lock->pending_readers);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(btrfs_drw_write_unlock);
+
+void btrfs_drw_read_lock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock)
+{
+ atomic_inc(&lock->readers);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the pending reader count is perceieved BEFORE this reader
+ * goes to sleep in case of active writers. This guarantees new writers
+ * won't be allowed and that the current reader will be woken up when
+ * the last active writer finishes its jobs.
+ */
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
+
+ wait_event(lock->pending_readers,
+ percpu_counter_sum(&lock->writers) == 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(btrfs_drw_read_lock);
+
+void btrfs_drw_read_unlock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock)
+{
+ /*
+ * Atomic RMW operations imply full barrier, so woken up writers
+ * are guaranteed to see the decrement
+ */
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lock->readers))
+ wake_up(&lock->pending_writers);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(btrfs_drw_read_unlock);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.h b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
index 595014f64830..44378c65f843 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@
#ifndef BTRFS_LOCKING_H
#define BTRFS_LOCKING_H
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
+
#define BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK 1
#define BTRFS_READ_LOCK 2
#define BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK_BLOCKING 3
@@ -39,4 +43,20 @@ static inline void btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw)
BUG();
}
+
+struct btrfs_drw_lock {
+ atomic_t readers;
+ struct percpu_counter writers;
+ wait_queue_head_t pending_writers;
+ wait_queue_head_t pending_readers;
+};
+
+int btrfs_drw_lock_init(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drw_lock_destroy(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drw_write_lock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock);
+bool btrfs_drw_try_write_lock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drw_write_unlock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drw_read_lock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drw_read_unlock(struct btrfs_drw_lock *lock);
+
#endif
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists