linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: vdso: Cleanup Makefiles.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <867d5696-6784-20ee-79cc-8a2bf39431f9@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:49:48 +0100
From:   Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, arnd@...db.de, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de, salyzyn@...roid.com,
        pcc@...gle.com, 0x7f454c46@...il.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
        huw@...eweavers.com, sthotton@...vell.com, andre.przywara@....com,
        luto@...nel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org, naohiro.aota@....com,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: vdso: Cleanup Makefiles.

Hi Will,

On 19/07/2019 09:04, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:41:21PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
>> index 21009ed5a755..6c4e496309c4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
>> @@ -155,17 +155,17 @@ $(asm-obj-vdso): %.o: %.S FORCE
>>  	$(call if_changed_dep,vdsoas)
>>  
>>  # Actual build commands
>> -quiet_cmd_vdsold_and_vdso_check = LD      $@
>> +quiet_cmd_vdsold_and_vdso_check = VDSOLIB $@
>>        cmd_vdsold_and_vdso_check = $(cmd_vdsold); $(cmd_vdso_check)
>>  
>> -quiet_cmd_vdsold = VDSOL   $@
>> +quiet_cmd_vdsold = VDSOLD  $@
> 
> I think we should be more consistent about whether or not we prefix things
> with VDSO, so either go with "VDSOLD, VDSOCC and VDSOAS" or stick to "LD,
> CC and AS" rather than mixing between them.
> 
> I think my suggestion would be something along the lines of CC, LD, AS for
> the native vdso and CC32, LD32, AS32 for the compat vdso.
> 

Sounds good. I will send v2 accordingly.

> Will
> 

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo