linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch: mark syscall number 435 reserved for clone3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874l3i8h0l.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jul 2019 20:18:02 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch: mark syscall number 435 reserved for clone3

Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:56:04PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> I think Vasily already has a clone3 patch for s390x with 435. 
>
> A quick follow-up on this. Helge and Michael have asked whether there
> are any tests for clone3. Yes, there will be and I try to have them
> ready by the end of the this or next week for review. In the meantime I
> hope the following minimalistic test program that just verifies very
> very basic functionality (It's not pretty.) will help you test:

Hi Christian,

Thanks for the test.

This actually oopses on powerpc, it hits the BUG_ON in CHECK_FULL_REGS
in process.c around line 1633:

	} else {
		/* user thread */
		struct pt_regs *regs = current_pt_regs();
		CHECK_FULL_REGS(regs);
		*childregs = *regs;
		if (usp)


So I'll have to dig into how we fix that before we wire up clone3.

Turns out testing is good! :)

cheers