[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9034a1d-1906-54e8-62f0-cdacf95c42ab@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:25:37 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC: Tom Joseph <tjoseph@...ence.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 23/30] of/platform: Export
of_platform_device_create_pdata()
Lorenzo,
On 11/06/19 10:08 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 10/06/19 11:13 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:19 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Export of_platform_device_create_pdata() to be used by drivers to
>>> create child devices with the given platform data. This can be used
>>> by platform specific driver to send platform data core driver. For e.g.,
>>> this will be used by TI's J721E SoC specific PCIe driver to send
>>> ->start_link() ops and ->is_link_up() ops to Cadence core PCIe driver.
>>
>> NAK
>>
>> of_platform_device_create_pdata() is purely for legacy handling of
>> auxdata which is something I hope to get rid of someday. Or to put it
>> another way, auxdata use is a sign of platforms not fully converted to
>> DT.
>
> All right. Thanks for letting me know your thoughts.
>
> Lorenzo,
>
> We've modeled Cadence PCIe core as a separate driver and for some of the
> functionalities (for example starting LTSSM or checking link status) it has to
> invoke the wrapper driver functions (The registers for these are present in
> wrapper and not in Cadence Core). In the case of Designware, we modeled DWC
> core as a library which provided APIs to be used by wrapper driver. Now that
> Rob is not inclined for passing platform data from one driver to another (in
> this case TI specific J721E driver to Cadence PCIe driver), should we model
> Cadence core also as a library? If you agree, I can prepare patches for making
> Cadence PCIe core as a library. Please let me know your thoughts.
Can you share your thoughts on this?
Thanks
Kishon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists