linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: dts: fsl: pico-pi: Add a device tree for the PICO-PI-IMX8M

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CAsTxEegEkBQ1uVaVD52WyLO7tV-GDSzYDDuEVpP6pmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Jul 2019 12:09:51 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     andradanciu1997 <andradanciu1997@...il.com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
        Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, pankaj.bansal@....com,
        Bhaskar Upadhaya <bhaskar.upadhaya@....com>,
        Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar_1@....com>,
        "Angus Ainslie (Purism)" <angus@...ea.ca>,
        Richard Hu <richard.hu@...hnexion.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: dts: fsl: pico-pi: Add a device tree for
 the PICO-PI-IMX8M

Hi Andra,

Just realized one minor issue:

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 9:14 AM andradanciu1997
<andradanciu1997@...il.com> wrote:

> +&i2c1 {
> +       clock-frequency = <100000>;
> +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> +       pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c1>;
> +       status = "okay";
> +
> +       pmic: pmic@4b {
> +               reg = <0x4b>;
> +               compatible = "rohm,bd71837";
> +               /* PMIC BD71837 PMIC_nINT GPIO1_IO12 */

Comment says gpio1 12...

> +               pinctrl-names = "default";
> +               pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_pmic>;
> +               clocks = <&pmic_osc>;
> +               clock-names = "osc";
> +               clock-output-names = "pmic_clk";
> +               interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
> +               interrupts = <3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;

but here you use gpio1 3 instead, so there is a mismatch.

Please check against the schematics and pick the correct one.

I would suggest removing the:
/* PMIC BD71837 PMIC_nINT GPIO1_IO12 */

comment entirely.

For the next version you can:

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>

Thanks