[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a7d9kq4a.fsf@suse.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 10:32:53 +0100
From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Waiman Long" <longman@...hat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@....com>,
"huang ying" <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"the arch\/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Linux List Kernel Mailing" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/19] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem->owner an atomic_long_t
Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com> writes:
> "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:32 PM Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch shouldn't change the behavior of the rwsem code. The code
>>> only access data within the rw_semaphore structures. I don't know why it
>>> will cause a KASAN error. I will have to reproduce it and figure out
>>> exactly which statement is doing the invalid access.
>>
>> The stack traces should show line numbers if you run them through
>> scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh.
>>
>> You need to have debug info enabled for that, though.
>>
>> Luis?
>>
>> Linus
>
> Yep, sure. And I should have done this in the initial report. It's a
> different trace, I had to recompile the kernel.
>
> (I'm also adding Jeff to the CC list.)
>
Ah, and I also managed to reproduce this on btrfs so I guess this rules
out a bug in the filesystem code.
Cheers,
--
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists