lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98b70190-a7d8-6251-84d9-599ca115f42b@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:24:45 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
        Li Guifu <bluce.liguifu@...wei.com>,
        Fang Wei <fangwei1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/24] erofs: add on-disk layout

Hi Greg,

On 2019/7/22 13:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:26:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Gao,
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:50:20 +0800 Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..e418725abfd6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR Apache-2.0 */
>>
>> I think the preferred tag is now GPL-2.0-only (assuming that is what is
>> intended).
> 
> Either is fine, see the LICENSE/preferred/GPL-2.0 file for the list of
> valid ones.

Yes, I noticed the LICENSE text before and I can do in the either way (use
GPL-2.0 or GPL-2.0-only). This modification won't take too much time...
If it is needed, I am happy to do that... That is fine :)

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ