[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR2201MB12773D46ADA8877F351BA55FC1C40@MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:21:54 +0000
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
CC: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <pburton@...ecomp.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, "od@...c.me" <od@...c.me>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Silsby <dansilsby@...il.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] MIPS: Undefine PMD_ORDER for 32-bit builds
Hello,
Paul Cercueil wrote:
> From: Daniel Silsby <dansilsby@...il.com>
>
> During an update long ago to conform to 4-level page code, PMD_ORDER was
> changed from 0 to 1, despite the fact that a PMD table is not used at
> all in a 32-bit MIPS build. PMD_ORDER does not seem to be used in these
> builds. Now, it matches PUD_ORDER, a nonsense #define to give a build
> failure with informative error.
>
> The older commit that had redefined PMD_ORDER was
> commit c6e8b587718c ("Update MIPS to use the 4-level pagetable code
> thereby getting rid of the compacrapability headers.")
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Silsby <dansilsby@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Applied to mips-next.
Thanks,
Paul
[ This message was auto-generated; if you believe anything is incorrect
then please email paul.burton@...s.com to report it. ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists