lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:27:50 +0800
From:   Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Shravan Kumar Ramani <sramani@...lanox.com>,
        LKP <lkp@...org>, David Woods <dwoods@...lanox.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [gpio] f69e00bd21: unixbench.score -24.2% regression

Hi Linus,

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 05:42:15AM +0800, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:15 PM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > FYI, we noticed a -24.2% regression of unixbench.score due to commit:
> > commit: f69e00bd21aa6a1961c521b6eb199137fcb8a76a ("gpio: mmio: Support two direction registers")
> > https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> 
> That's pretty bogus since the test doesn't even seem to be using GPIO.
> Further AFAIK Intel chips don't even use that driver.
> 
> Can you provide some rootcausing?

We did some further check, and found this is a false alarm. That some recent 
change to LKP itself has enabled the latencytop for newer kernel(post 5.1-rc1),
and latencytop is known to bring extra system load to scheduling related
benchmarks like unixbench, which caused this -24.7 difference of unixbench
score. Sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
Feng


> If you are using GPIOs from userspace in the test somehow I am
> sure both me and Bartosz would be interested to hear how.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list
> LKP@...ts.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ