| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190722215054.B35FA21951@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:50:53 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: "open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Weijie Gao <hackpascal@...il.com>, NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>,
Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] MIPS: ralink: fix cpu clock of mt7621 and add dt clk devices
Quoting Chuanhong Guo (2019-07-09 11:20:15)
> For a long time the mt7621 uses a fixed cpu clock which causes a problem
> if the cpu frequency is not 880MHz.
>
> This patch fixes the cpu clock calculation and adds the cpu/bus clkdev
> which will be used in dts.
>
> Ported from OpenWrt:
> c7ca224299 ramips: fix cpu clock of mt7621 and add dt clk devices
>
> Signed-off-by: Weijie Gao <hackpascal@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/mt7621.c b/arch/mips/ralink/mt7621.c
> index 9415be0d57b8..31158b88bcb6 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/ralink/mt7621.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/mt7621.c
> @@ -7,22 +7,22 @@
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
Is this include used?
> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h>
>
> #include <asm/mipsregs.h>
> #include <asm/smp-ops.h>
> #include <asm/mips-cps.h>
> #include <asm/mach-ralink/ralink_regs.h>
> #include <asm/mach-ralink/mt7621.h>
> +#include <asm/time.h>
>
> #include <pinmux.h>
>
> #include "common.h"
>
> -#define SYSC_REG_SYSCFG 0x10
> -#define SYSC_REG_CPLL_CLKCFG0 0x2c
> -#define SYSC_REG_CUR_CLK_STS 0x44
> -#define CPU_CLK_SEL (BIT(30) | BIT(31))
> -
> #define MT7621_GPIO_MODE_UART1 1
> #define MT7621_GPIO_MODE_I2C 2
> #define MT7621_GPIO_MODE_UART3_MASK 0x3
> @@ -108,49 +108,89 @@ static struct rt2880_pmx_group mt7621_pinmux_data[] = {
> { 0 }
> };
>
> +static struct clk *clks[MT7621_CLK_MAX];
> +static struct clk_onecell_data clk_data = {
> + .clks = clks,
> + .clk_num = ARRAY_SIZE(clks),
> +};
> +
> phys_addr_t mips_cpc_default_phys_base(void)
> {
> panic("Cannot detect cpc address");
> }
>
> +static struct clk *__init mt7621_add_sys_clkdev(
> + const char *id, unsigned long rate)
> +{
> + struct clk *clk;
> + int err;
> +
> + clk = clk_register_fixed_rate(NULL, id, NULL, 0, rate);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> + panic("failed to allocate %s clock structure", id);
> +
> + err = clk_register_clkdev(clk, id, NULL);
What's the need to use clkdev? i.e. why can't we just use clk_get() with
proper DT definitions and by passing in the right device pointer?
> + if (err)
> + panic("unable to register %s clock device", id);
> +
> + return clk;
> +}
> +
> void __init ralink_clk_init(void)
> {
> - int cpu_fdiv = 0;
> - int cpu_ffrac = 0;
> - int fbdiv = 0;
> - u32 clk_sts, syscfg;
> - u8 clk_sel = 0, xtal_mode;
> - u32 cpu_clk;
> + const static u32 prediv_tbl[] = {0, 1, 2, 2};
> + u32 syscfg, xtal_sel, clkcfg, clk_sel, curclk, ffiv, ffrac;
> + u32 pll, prediv, fbdiv;
> + u32 xtal_clk, cpu_clk, bus_clk;
> +
> + syscfg = rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_SYSTEM_CONFIG0);
> + xtal_sel = (syscfg >> XTAL_MODE_SEL_SHIFT) & XTAL_MODE_SEL_MASK;
>
> - if ((rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_CPLL_CLKCFG0) & CPU_CLK_SEL) != 0)
> - clk_sel = 1;
> + clkcfg = rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_CLKCFG0);
> + clk_sel = (clkcfg >> CPU_CLK_SEL_SHIFT) & CPU_CLK_SEL_MASK;
> +
> + curclk = rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_CUR_CLK_STS);
> + ffiv = (curclk >> CUR_CPU_FDIV_SHIFT) & CUR_CPU_FDIV_MASK;
> + ffrac = (curclk >> CUR_CPU_FFRAC_SHIFT) & CUR_CPU_FFRAC_MASK;
> +
> + if (xtal_sel <= 2)
> + xtal_clk = 20 * 1000 * 1000;
> + else if (xtal_sel <= 5)
> + xtal_clk = 40 * 1000 * 1000;
> + else
> + xtal_clk = 25 * 1000 * 1000;
>
> switch (clk_sel) {
> case 0:
> - clk_sts = rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_CUR_CLK_STS);
> - cpu_fdiv = ((clk_sts >> 8) & 0x1F);
> - cpu_ffrac = (clk_sts & 0x1F);
> - cpu_clk = (500 * cpu_ffrac / cpu_fdiv) * 1000 * 1000;
> + cpu_clk = 500 * 1000 * 1000;
> break;
> -
> case 1:
> - fbdiv = ((rt_sysc_r32(0x648) >> 4) & 0x7F) + 1;
> - syscfg = rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_SYSCFG);
> - xtal_mode = (syscfg >> 6) & 0x7;
> - if (xtal_mode >= 6) {
> - /* 25Mhz Xtal */
> - cpu_clk = 25 * fbdiv * 1000 * 1000;
> - } else if (xtal_mode >= 3) {
> - /* 40Mhz Xtal */
> - cpu_clk = 40 * fbdiv * 1000 * 1000;
> - } else {
> - /* 20Mhz Xtal */
> - cpu_clk = 20 * fbdiv * 1000 * 1000;
> - }
> + pll = rt_memc_r32(MEMC_REG_CPU_PLL);
> + fbdiv = (pll >> CPU_PLL_FBDIV_SHIFT) & CPU_PLL_FBDIV_MASK;
> + prediv = (pll >> CPU_PLL_PREDIV_SHIFT) & CPU_PLL_PREDIV_MASK;
> + cpu_clk = ((fbdiv + 1) * xtal_clk) >> prediv_tbl[prediv];
> break;
> + default:
> + cpu_clk = xtal_clk;
> }
> +
> + cpu_clk = cpu_clk / ffiv * ffrac;
> + bus_clk = cpu_clk / 4;
> +
> + clks[MT7621_CLK_CPU] = mt7621_add_sys_clkdev("cpu", cpu_clk);
> + clks[MT7621_CLK_BUS] = mt7621_add_sys_clkdev("bus", bus_clk);
> +
> + pr_info("CPU Clock: %dMHz\n", cpu_clk / 1000000);
> + mips_hpt_frequency = cpu_clk / 2;
There are a few changes here. Probably the patch should be split up a
bit more to only do one thing at a time, instead of assign
mips_hpt_frequency, change the calculation code, and change the way clks
are provided on this platform.
> }
>
> +static void __init mt7621_clocks_init_dt(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &clk_data);
> +}
> +
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(mt7621_clk, "mediatek,mt7621-pll", mt7621_clocks_init_dt);
> +
> void __init ralink_of_remap(void)
> {
> rt_sysc_membase = plat_of_remap_node("mtk,mt7621-sysc");
> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/timer-gic.c b/arch/mips/ralink/timer-gic.c
> index 944fbe0fc741..9bbaa37a0da1 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/ralink/timer-gic.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/timer-gic.c
> @@ -9,14 +9,14 @@
>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> -#include <linux/clocksource.h>
> +#include <asm/time.h>
>
> #include "common.h"
>
> void __init plat_time_init(void)
> {
> ralink_of_remap();
> -
> + ralink_clk_init();
Why can't everything flow from CLK_OF_DECLARE() for a particular node?
Even better would be to make a device driver instead of using
CLK_OF_DECLARE(), but either way this doesn't look necessary to make a
direct function call here.
> of_clk_init(NULL);
> timer_probe();
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists