[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b29804b-528b-61bd-1ab6-4e442d360cf9@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:28:30 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <zhengfeiran@...edance.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Fei Li <lifei.shirley@...edance.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [External Email] Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio-mmio: Process vrings more
proactively
On 7/19/19 11:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:31:34PM +0800, Fei Li wrote:
>> From: Fam Zheng <zhengfeiran@...edance.com>
>>
>> This allows the backend to _not_ trap mmio read of the status register
>> after injecting IRQ in the data path, which can improve the performance
>> significantly by avoiding a vmexit for each interrupt.
>>
>> More importantly it also makes it possible for Firecracker to hook up
>> virtio-mmio with vhost-net, in which case there isn't a way to implement
>> proper status register handling.
>>
>> For a complete backend that does set either INT_CONFIG bit or INT_VRING
>> bit upon generating irq, what happens hasn't changed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <zhengfeiran@...edance.com>
> This has a side effect of skipping vring callbacks
> if they trigger at the same time with a config
> interrupt.
> I don't see why this is safe.
Good point! I think the block can be moved out from the else block and
run unconditionally then.
Fam
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
>> index e09edb5c5e06..9b42502b2204 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
>> @@ -295,9 +295,7 @@ static irqreturn_t vm_interrupt(int irq, void *opaque)
>> if (unlikely(status & VIRTIO_MMIO_INT_CONFIG)) {
>> virtio_config_changed(&vm_dev->vdev);
>> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (likely(status & VIRTIO_MMIO_INT_VRING)) {
>> + } else {
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&vm_dev->lock, flags);
>> list_for_each_entry(info, &vm_dev->virtqueues, node)
>> ret |= vring_interrupt(irq, info->vq);
>> --
>> 2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists