linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/irq/64: fix the missing update on comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9333bd0-2a62-7380-8172-facee7a61e11@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:13:26 +0800
From:   Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/irq/64: fix the missing update on comment

On 7/22/19 4:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Cao,
> 
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, Cao jin wrote:
> 
>> Commit e6401c130931 ("x86/irq/64: Split the IRQ stack into its own pages")
>> missed to update one piece of comment as it did to its peer in Xen, which
>> will confuse people who still need to read comment.
>>
>> A bonus fix to identation in ZO's linker script: spaces -> tab.
> 
> Please don't add 'bonus' changes. A patch which fixes a stale comment has
> nothing to do with a indentation change in an unrelated file.
> 

Kept that in mind. Sorry for the inconvenience.

-- 
Sincerely,
Cao jin