[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190722023530.67676-2-skunberg.kelsey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 20:35:28 -0600
From: Kelsey Skunberg <skunberg.kelsey@...il.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, bjorn@...gaas.com,
skunberg.kelsey@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: Remove acpi_has_method() call from acpi_adxl.c
acpi_check_dsm() will already return an error if the DSM method does not
exist. Checking if the DSM method exists before the acpi_check_dsm() call
is not needed. Remove acpi_has_method() call to avoid additional work.
Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <skunberg.kelsey@...il.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_adxl.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_adxl.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_adxl.c
index 13c8f7b50c46..89aac15663fd 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_adxl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_adxl.c
@@ -148,11 +148,6 @@ static int __init adxl_init(void)
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_DSM")) {
- pr_info("No DSM method\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
if (!acpi_check_dsm(handle, &adxl_guid, ADXL_REVISION,
ADXL_IDX_GET_ADDR_PARAMS |
ADXL_IDX_FORWARD_TRANSLATE)) {
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists