| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZDpOA1mD77t3RB6hEG7o3+ws8y64m1DU8=3HdZ4zy4AUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:51:04 +0530
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-amarula <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/22] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: Add minimum rate for PLL_MIPI
Hi Maxime,
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 3:02 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:46:27PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:28 PM Maxime Ripard
> > <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 07:43:16PM +0200, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> > > > > > tcon-pixel clock is the rate that you want to achive on display side
> > > > > > and if you have 4 lanes 32bit or lanes and different bit number that
> > > > > > you need to have a clock that is able to put outside bits and speed
> > > > > > equal to pixel-clock * bits / lanes. so If you want a pixel-clock of
> > > > > > 40 mhz and you have 32bits and 4 lanes you need to have a clock of
> > > > > > 40 * 32 / 4 in no-burst mode. I think that this is done but most of
> > > > > > the display.
> > > > >
> > > > > So this is what the issue is then?
> > > > >
> > > > > This one does make sense, and you should just change the rate in the
> > > > > call to clk_set_rate in sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_cpu.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm still wondering why that hasn't been brought up in either the
> > > > > discussion or the commit log before though.
> > > > >
> > > > Something like this?
> > > >
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h | 2 --
> > > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > > > index 64c43ee6bd92..42560d5c327c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > > > @@ -263,10 +263,11 @@ static int sun4i_tcon_get_clk_delay(const struct
> > > > drm_display_mode *mode,
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > > - const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > > > + const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > > > + u32 tcon_mul)
> > > > {
> > > > /* Configure the dot clock */
> > > > - clk_set_rate(tcon->dclk, mode->crtc_clock * 1000);
> > > > + clk_set_rate(tcon->dclk, mode->crtc_clock * tcon_mul * 1000);
> > > >
> > > > /* Set the resolution */
> > > > regmap_write(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_BASIC0_REG,
> > > > @@ -335,12 +336,13 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_cpu(struct
> > > > sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > > u8 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(device->format);
> > > > u8 lanes = device->lanes;
> > > > u32 block_space, start_delay;
> > > > - u32 tcon_div;
> > > > + u32 tcon_div, tcon_mul;
> > > >
> > > > - tcon->dclk_min_div = SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV;
> > > > - tcon->dclk_max_div = SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV;
> > > > + tcon->dclk_min_div = 4;
> > > > + tcon->dclk_max_div = 127;
> > > >
> > > > - sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode);
> > > > + tcon_mul = bpp / lanes;
> > > > + sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode, tcon_mul);
> > > >
> > > > /* Set dithering if needed */
> > > > sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_dithering(tcon, sun4i_tcon_get_connector(encoder));
> > > > @@ -366,7 +368,7 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_cpu(struct
> > > > sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > > */
> > > > regmap_read(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_DCLK_REG, &tcon_div);
> > > > tcon_div &= GENMASK(6, 0);
> > > > - block_space = mode->htotal * bpp / (tcon_div * lanes);
> > > > + block_space = mode->htotal * tcon_div * tcon_mul;
> > > > block_space -= mode->hdisplay + 40;
> > > >
> > > > regmap_write(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_CPU_TRI0_REG,
> > > > @@ -408,7 +410,7 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_lvds(struct
> > > > sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > >
> > > > tcon->dclk_min_div = 7;
> > > > tcon->dclk_max_div = 7;
> > > > - sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode);
> > > > + sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode, 1);
> > > >
> > > > /* Set dithering if needed */
> > > > sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_dithering(tcon, sun4i_tcon_get_connector(encoder));
> > > > @@ -487,7 +489,7 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct
> > > > sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > >
> > > > tcon->dclk_min_div = 6;
> > > > tcon->dclk_max_div = 127;
> > > > - sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode);
> > > > + sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode, 1);
> > > >
> > > > /* Set dithering if needed */
> > > > sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_dithering(tcon, connector);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h
> > > > index 5c3ad5be0690..a07090579f84 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h
> > > > @@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
> > > > #include <drm/drm_encoder.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> > > >
> > > > -#define SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV 4
> > > > -
> > > > struct sun6i_dsi {
> > > > struct drm_connector connector;
> > > > struct drm_encoder encoder;
> > >
> > > I had more something like this in mind:
> > > http://code.bulix.org/nlp5a4-803511
> >
> > Worth to look at it. was it working on your panel? meanwhile I will check it.
>
> I haven't tested it.
>
> > We have updated with below change [1], seems working on but is
> > actually checking the each divider as before start with 4... till 127.
> >
> > This new approach, is start looking the best divider from 4.. based on
> > the idea vs rounded it will ended up best divider like [2]
>
> But why?
>
> I mean, it's not like it's the first time I'm asking this...
>
> If the issue is what Micheal described, then the divider has nothing
> to do with it. We've had that discussion over and over again.
This is what Michael is mentioned in above mail
"tcon-pixel clock is the rate that you want to achive on display side and
if you have 4 lanes 32bit or lanes and different bit number that you need
to have a clock that is able to put outside bits and speed equal to
pixel-clock * bits / lanes. so If you want a pixel-clock of 40 mhz
and you have 32bits and 4 lanes you need to have a clock of
40 * 32 / 4 in no-burst mode. "
He is trying to manage the bpp/lanes into dclk_mul (in last mail) and
it can multiply with pixel clock which is rate argument in
sun4i_dclk_round_rate.
The solution I have mentioned in dclk_min, max is bpp/lanes also
multiple rate in dotclock sun4i_dclk_round_rate.
In both cases the overall pll_rate depends on dividers, the one that I
have on this patch is based on BSP and the Michael one is more generic
way so-that it can not to touch other functionalities and looping
dividers to find the best one.
If dclk_min/max is bpp/lanes then dotclock directly using divider 6
(assuming 24-bit and 4 lanes) and return the pll_rate and divider 6
associated.
if dclk_mul is bpp/lanes, on Michael new change, the dividers start
with 4 and end with 127 but the constant ideal rate which rate *
bpp/lanes but the loop from sun4i_dclk_round_rate computed the divider
as 6 only, ie what I'm mentioned on the above mail.
Jagan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists