linux-kernel - Re: [for-next][PATCH 12/16] kprobes: Initialize kprobes at postcore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190722124202.GF60625@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:42:02 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 12/16] kprobes: Initialize kprobes at
 postcore_initcall

Hi Steve,

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:15:20AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 15:08:32 +0100
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > > index 5471efbeb937..0ca6f53c8505 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > > @@ -2235,6 +2235,8 @@ static struct notifier_block kprobe_module_nb = {
> > >  extern unsigned long __start_kprobe_blacklist[];
> > >  extern unsigned long __stop_kprobe_blacklist[];
> > >  
> > > +static bool run_kprobe_tests __initdata;
> > > +
> > >  static int __init init_kprobes(void)
> > >  {
> > >  	int i, err = 0;
> > > @@ -2286,11 +2288,18 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
> > >  	kprobes_initialized = (err == 0);
> > >  
> > >  	if (!err)
> > > -		init_test_probes();
> > > +		run_kprobe_tests = true;
> > >  	return err;
> > >  }
> > >  subsys_initcall(init_kprobes);
> > >  
> > > +static int __init run_init_test_probes(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (run_kprobe_tests)
> > > +		init_test_probes();  
> > 
> > A return 0 here.
> > 
> > > +}
> > > +module_init(run_init_test_probes);  
> > 
> > This does the trick. I prefer your fix as it leaves the arch code
> > unchanged. In case you need it:
> 
> And I actually think yours is better for the opposite reason ;-)
> 
> I agree with Masami, that the selftest actually caught a bug here. I
> think the arch code may need to change as the purpose of Masami's
> changes was to enable kprobes earlier in boot. The selftest failing
> means that an early kprobe will fail too.

I just got back from holiday and catching up with emails. Do I still
need to merge the arm64 fix making the debug initialisation a
core_initcall()?

Can we actually get kprobes invoked before init_kprobes() has been
called?

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin