linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited against NULL dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:26:38 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Cc:     eric.auger.pro@...il.com, hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        robin.murphy@....com, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
 against NULL dma_mask

>  static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> -		dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> +	return WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev->dma_mask) ? false :
> +		min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> +			dma_get_required_mask(dev);

This should really use a separate if statement, but I can fix that
up when applying it.