[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190722160908.GZ9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:09:08 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] backlight: gpio: use a helper variable for
&pdev->dev
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 05:03:02PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Instead of dereferencing pdev each time, use a helper variable for
> the associated device pointer.
> static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata =
> - dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata;
> struct backlight_properties props;
> struct backlight_device *bl;
> struct gpio_backlight *gbl;
> enum gpiod_flags flags;
> + struct device *dev;
Can't we do
struct device dev = &pdev->dev;
struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
? It fits 80 nicely.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists