lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     hslester96@...il.com
Cc:     woojung.huh@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        steve.glendinning@...well.net, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: Merge cpu_to_le32s + memcpy to
 put_unaligned_le32

From: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:16:27 +0800

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> 于2019年7月23日周二 上午9:22写道:
>>
>> From: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
>> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:41:34 +0800
>>
>> > Merge the combo uses of cpu_to_le32s and memcpy.
>> > Use put_unaligned_le32 instead.
>> > This simplifies the code.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
>>
>> Isn't the skb->data aligned to 4 bytes in these situations?
>>
>> If so, we should use the aligned variants.
>>
>> Thank you.
> 
> I have checked the five changed files.
> I find that they all have used get_unaligned_le32 for skb->data
> according to my previous applied patches and existing code.
> So I think the skb->data is unaligned in these situations.

Thank you for checking.

Patch applied to net-next.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ