[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907230837400.1659@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:41:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
cc: Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: Fail if gold linker is detected
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Right.
> I was able to build with ld.gold
>
> So, we can use gold, depending on the kernel configuration.
That's exactly the problem. It breaks with random kernel configurations
which is not acceptable except for people who know what they are doing.
I'm tired of dealing with half baken fixes and 'regression' reports. Either
there is an effort to fix the issues with gold like the clang people fix
their issues or it needs to be disabled. We have a clear statement that
gold developers have other priorities.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists