lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:08:19 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Tina" <tina.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "Lu, Kechen" <kechen.lu@...el.com>
CC:     "intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org" 
        <intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kraxel@...hat.com" <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        "zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Lv, Zhiyuan" <zhiyuan.lv@...el.com>,
        "Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        "Yuan, Hang" <hang.yuan@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] vfio: Introduce vGPU display irq type



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@...hat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 3:41 AM
> To: Lu, Kechen <kechen.lu@...el.com>
> Cc: intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Zhang, Tina <tina.zhang@...el.com>;
> kraxel@...hat.com; zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com; Lv, Zhiyuan
> <zhiyuan.lv@...el.com>; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>; Tian, Kevin
> <kevin.tian@...el.com>; Yuan, Hang <hang.yuan@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] vfio: Introduce vGPU display irq type
> 
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 05:28:35 +0000
> "Lu, Kechen" <kechen.lu@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@...hat.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2019 12:25 AM
> > > To: Lu, Kechen <kechen.lu@...el.com>
> > > Cc: intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > > kernel@...r.kernel.org; Zhang, Tina <tina.zhang@...el.com>;
> > > kraxel@...hat.com; zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com; Lv, Zhiyuan
> > > <zhiyuan.lv@...el.com>; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>; Tian,
> > > Kevin <kevin.tian@...el.com>; Yuan, Hang <hang.yuan@...el.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] vfio: Introduce vGPU display irq
> > > type
> > >
> > > On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 23:56:36 +0800
> > > Kechen Lu <kechen.lu@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@...el.com>
> > > >
> > > > Introduce vGPU specific irq type VFIO_IRQ_TYPE_GFX, and
> > > > VFIO_IRQ_SUBTYPE_GFX_DISPLAY_IRQ as the subtype for vGPU display
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@...el.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 3 +++
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > > index be6adab4f759..df28b17a6e2e 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > > @@ -469,6 +469,9 @@ struct vfio_irq_info_cap_type {
> > > >  	__u32 subtype;  /* type specific */  };
> > > >
> > > > +#define VFIO_IRQ_TYPE_GFX				(1)
> > > > +#define VFIO_IRQ_SUBTYPE_GFX_DISPLAY_IRQ		(1)
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Please include a description defining exactly what this IRQ is intended to
> signal.
> > > For instance, if another vGPU vendor wanted to implement this in
> > > their driver and didn't have the QEMU code for reference to what it
> > > does with the IRQ, what would they need to know?  Thanks,
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> >
> > Yes, that makes more sense. I'll add the description for it at next version
> patch.
> >
> > BTW, may I have one more question? In the current design ideas, we
> > partitioned the vGPU display eventfd counted 8-byte value into at most
> > 8 events to deliver multiple display events, so we need different
> > increasement counter value to differentiate the events. As this is the
> > exposed thing the QEMU has to know, we plan adds a macro here
> > VFIO_IRQ_SUBTYPE_GFX_DISPLAY_EVENTFD_BASE_SHIFT to make sure
> the
> > partitions shift in 1 byte, does it make sense putting here? Looking forward
> to your and Gerd's comments. Thanks!
> 
> Couldn't you expose this as another capability within the IRQ_INFO return
> data?  If you were to define it as a macro, I assume that means it would be
> hard coded, in which case this probably becomes an Intel specific IRQ, rather
> than what appears to be framed as a generic graphics IRQ extension.  A new
> capability could instead allow the vendor to specify their own value, where
> we could define how userspace should interpret and make use of this value.
> Thanks,
Good suggestion. Currently, vfio_irq_info is used to save one irq info. What we need here is to use it to save several events info. Maybe we could figure out a general layout of this capability so that it can be leveraged by others, not only for display irq/events.
Thanks.

BR,
Tina

> 
> Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ