[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJUCPCyC-n9V+o5veMTm-yui8H2vdn1ceqZN=VG+yosLOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:34:28 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Use dev_get_drvdata
wt., 23 lip 2019 o 10:29 Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com> napisaĆ(a):
>
> Instead of using to_pci_dev + pci_get_drvdata,
> use dev_get_drvdata to make code simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
> index 1d99293096f2..3f3d9a94b709 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
> @@ -409,8 +409,7 @@ static int pch_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> static int __maybe_unused pch_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> - struct pch_gpio *chip = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct pch_gpio *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
> @@ -422,8 +421,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused pch_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
> static int __maybe_unused pch_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> - struct pch_gpio *chip = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct pch_gpio *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
The subject line should start with gpio: pch: ...
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists