[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190723091820.GZ3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:18:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [5.2 REGRESSION] Generic vDSO breaks seccomp-enabled userspace
on i386
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:47:36PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I don't love this whole concept, but I also don't have a better idea.
Are we really talking about changing the kernel because BPF is expecting
things? That is, did we just elevate everything BPF can observe to ABI?
/me runs for cover.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists