lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190723012721.GA60134@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:27:21 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to read source block before
 invalidating it

On 07/18, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/7/18 12:00, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/18, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2019/7/18 11:12, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> f2fs_allocate_data_block() invalidates old block address and enable new block
> >>> address. Then, if we try to read old block by f2fs_submit_page_bio(), it will
> >>> give WARN due to reading invalid blocks.
> >>>
> >>> Let's make the order sanely back.
> >>
> >> Hmm.. to avoid WARM, we may suffer one more memcpy, I suspect this can reduce
> >> online resize or foreground gc ioctl performance...
> > 
> > I worried about performance tho, more concern came to me that there may exist a
> > chance that other thread can allocate and write something in old block address.
> 
> Me too, however, previous invalid block address should be reused after a
> checkpoint, and checkpoint should have invalidated meta cache already, so there
> shouldn't be any race here.

I think SSR can reuse that before checkpoint.

> 
> 	/*
> 	 * invalidate intermediate page cache borrowed from meta inode
> 	 * which are used for migration of encrypted inode's blocks.
> 	 */
> 	if (f2fs_sb_has_encrypt(sbi))
> 		invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi),
> 				MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi), MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) - 1);
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> Can we just relief to use DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ for this case...?
> > 
> > We need to keep consistency for this api.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> Except performance, I'm okay with this change.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2:
> >>> I was fixing the comments. :)
> >>>
> >>>  fs/f2fs/gc.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> index 6691f526fa40..8974672db78f 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> @@ -796,6 +796,29 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
> >>>  	if (lfs_mode)
> >>>  		down_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock);
> >>>  
> >>> +	mpage = f2fs_grab_cache_page(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi),
> >>> +					fio.old_blkaddr, false);
> >>> +	if (!mpage)
> >>> +		goto up_out;
> >>> +
> >>> +	fio.encrypted_page = mpage;
> >>> +
> >>> +	/* read source block in mpage */
> >>> +	if (!PageUptodate(mpage)) {
> >>> +		err = f2fs_submit_page_bio(&fio);
> >>> +		if (err) {
> >>> +			f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1);
> >>> +			goto up_out;
> >>> +		}
> >>> +		lock_page(mpage);
> >>> +		if (unlikely(mpage->mapping != META_MAPPING(fio.sbi) ||
> >>> +						!PageUptodate(mpage))) {
> >>> +			err = -EIO;
> >>> +			f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1);
> >>> +			goto up_out;
> >>> +		}
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>>  	f2fs_allocate_data_block(fio.sbi, NULL, fio.old_blkaddr, &newaddr,
> >>>  					&sum, CURSEG_COLD_DATA, NULL, false);
> >>>  
> >>> @@ -803,44 +826,18 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
> >>>  				newaddr, FGP_LOCK | FGP_CREAT, GFP_NOFS);
> >>>  	if (!fio.encrypted_page) {
> >>>  		err = -ENOMEM;
> >>> -		goto recover_block;
> >>> -	}
> >>> -
> >>> -	mpage = f2fs_pagecache_get_page(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi),
> >>> -					fio.old_blkaddr, FGP_LOCK, GFP_NOFS);
> >>> -	if (mpage) {
> >>> -		bool updated = false;
> >>> -
> >>> -		if (PageUptodate(mpage)) {
> >>> -			memcpy(page_address(fio.encrypted_page),
> >>> -					page_address(mpage), PAGE_SIZE);
> >>> -			updated = true;
> >>> -		}
> >>>  		f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1);
> >>> -		invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi),
> >>> -					fio.old_blkaddr, fio.old_blkaddr);
> >>> -		if (updated)
> >>> -			goto write_page;
> >>> -	}
> >>> -
> >>> -	err = f2fs_submit_page_bio(&fio);
> >>> -	if (err)
> >>> -		goto put_page_out;
> >>> -
> >>> -	/* write page */
> >>> -	lock_page(fio.encrypted_page);
> >>> -
> >>> -	if (unlikely(fio.encrypted_page->mapping != META_MAPPING(fio.sbi))) {
> >>> -		err = -EIO;
> >>> -		goto put_page_out;
> >>> -	}
> >>> -	if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(fio.encrypted_page))) {
> >>> -		err = -EIO;
> >>> -		goto put_page_out;
> >>> +		goto recover_block;
> >>>  	}
> >>>  
> >>> -write_page:
> >>> +	/* write target block */
> >>>  	f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(fio.encrypted_page, DATA, true, true);
> >>> +	memcpy(page_address(fio.encrypted_page),
> >>> +				page_address(mpage), PAGE_SIZE);
> >>> +	f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1);
> >>> +	invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi),
> >>> +				fio.old_blkaddr, fio.old_blkaddr);
> >>> +
> >>>  	set_page_dirty(fio.encrypted_page);
> >>>  	if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(fio.encrypted_page))
> >>>  		dec_page_count(fio.sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> >>> @@ -871,11 +868,12 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
> >>>  put_page_out:
> >>>  	f2fs_put_page(fio.encrypted_page, 1);
> >>>  recover_block:
> >>> -	if (lfs_mode)
> >>> -		up_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock);
> >>>  	if (err)
> >>>  		f2fs_do_replace_block(fio.sbi, &sum, newaddr, fio.old_blkaddr,
> >>>  								true, true);
> >>> +up_out:
> >>> +	if (lfs_mode)
> >>> +		up_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock);
> >>>  put_out:
> >>>  	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> >>>  out:
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > .
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ