[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <901b9b74-4c59-9c6a-ce41-404d8885cb83@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:29:27 +0200
From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Input: soc_button_array - Add support for newer
surface devices
On 7/22/19 10:00 AM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> On 20.07.19 17:05, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>> Power and volume button support for 5th and 6th generation Microsoft
>> Surface devices via soc_button_array.
>>
>> Note that these devices use the same MSHW0040 device as on the Surface
>> Pro 4, however the implementation is different (GPIOs vs. ACPI
>> notifications). Thus some checking is required to ensure we only load
>> this driver on the correct devices.
>
> Could this also used on the older (pre pro4) devices (also using the
> gpios directly, and leave off acpi notifications) ?
As far as I can tell, no. The Pro 4 and Pro 3 don't have any GPIOs on
MSHW0028/MSHW0040. Book 1 has GPIOs but for a different purpose. The Pro
2 has a standard PNP0C0C power button (no idea how the volume buttons
are handled there, but also seems to be different from what I can gather
from DSDT). I can't say anything for the Pro 1 and non-Pro devices.
Maximilian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists