[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2z=h02_1ybRzL1DpW26-Qn-v22=Fdf_Z_C02fYg9OFgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:29:23 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org" <xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net-next] net/mlx5e: xsk: dynamically allocate mlx5e_channel_param
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:21 PM Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com> wrote:
> On 2019-07-08 18:16, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> > On 2019-07-08 15:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> - mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, &cparam);
> >> + cparam = kzalloc(sizeof(*cparam), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Similar code in mlx5e_open_channels (en_main.c) uses kvzalloc. Although
> > the struct is currently smaller than a page anyway, and there should be
> > no difference in behavior now, I suggest using the same alloc function
> > to keep code uniform.
> >
> >> /* Create a dedicated SQ for posting NOPs whenever we need an IRQ to be
> >> * triggered and NAPI to be called on the correct CPU.
> >> */
> >> - err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam.icosq, &c->xskicosq);
> >> + err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam->icosq, &c->xskicosq);
> >> if (unlikely(err))
> >> goto err_close_icocq;
> >>
> >
> > Here is kfree missing. It's a memory leak in the good path.
>
> Arnd, I'm going to take over your patch and respin it, addressing my own
> comments, because it's been quite a while, and we want to have this fix.
>
> Thanks for spotting it.
Thanks for taking care of it now. I was planning to do a respin, but
the reply got lost in the depth of my inbox so I forgot about it.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists